Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
SprintSPH-L900
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.34 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note II's 71.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.1, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. The Google Pixel 3a is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy Note II.
The Samsung Galaxy Note II counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note II, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2220, a lot greater display density and a quite bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way higher resolution camera. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note II, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note II counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3100mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 3a is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note II.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.