Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
T-MobileSGH-T889
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.16 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.34 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than the Galaxy Note II, getting a 78.8 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 3a's construction is incredibly newer, lighter and thinner than Galaxy Note II. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.1 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note II has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 4 less and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note II, because it has a way better display pixels density, a bit larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels.
Google Pixel 3a counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3a has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note II, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Note II features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.