Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
VerizonSCH-I605
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 225.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the Galaxy Note II, getting a score of 78.8 against 72. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2 version. Google Pixel 3a is a extremely newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy Note II.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note II, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2220px, a way greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a little larger display. The Galaxy Note II has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has lesser and slower cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 3a features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note II, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3a captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Note II features a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.