Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.0.3 | -- |
| 2012-07-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 340.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is way better than Galaxy Note T-Mobile's score of 65.6. Google Pixel 4 is a incredibly newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy Note T-Mobile. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a much better display pixel density, a little larger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has 6 more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a 12 percent greater battery size. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a much bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.