Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-07-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 340.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile's general score of 65.6. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile has Android 4.0.3.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a screen that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile's display, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a larger screen and a higher display pixel density.
Galaxy A51 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a lot larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note T-Mobile, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.