Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is slightly better than the Google Pixel, having an 86.2 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel, but it's notably heavier. Google Pixel features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a tinier sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.