Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 86.2 score against 78.8. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite body is notably heavier and a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution and a worse video definition, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.