Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 global score. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Honor 50 Pro. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user all the same OS features.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little better performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px and a quite better display density.
The Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in low light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a bit better battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.