Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is better than HTC One M9's score of 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than HTC One M9, but it is also much heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photos and videos and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much larger aperture. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.