Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than LG K92's overall score of 85.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features and better performance. The Galaxy Note10 Lite body is a little bit lighter than the LG K92, but it is a little thicker and was released just 10 months before.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than LG K92. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better looking display than LG K92. Both of them have a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a same size screen and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The LG K92 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.