Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V30S ThinQ. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot lower resolution camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.