Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, a smaller camera aperture and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.