Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note10 Lite's 86.2 global score. Even though LG Velvet and Galaxy Note10 Lite were released only 4 months apart, LG Velvet is a little lighter and a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little faster CPU than LG Velvet. They have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and the LG Velvet have quite similar screens, although the LG Velvet also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little higher pixel density and a quite bigger screen. The LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
LG Velvet has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.