Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2024), with a overall score of 86.2 against 78.5. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also an a lot older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier device. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge (2024) features a much better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution, a worse video quality and a way tinier back camera sensor capturing way worse quality photos and videos, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.