Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's overall score of 81.9. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must note that it's also a older, heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760px.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.