Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's 86.2 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a just a bit lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, but both of them are 0.34inches thick. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite. They have a screen with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy Note10 Lite one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.