Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting an 86.2 score against 82.6. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little thinner and just a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM. Moto G 5G Plus features a screen that is just as good as Galaxy Note10 Lite's screen, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display, they both have a display with the same size.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
The Moto G 5G Plus takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.