Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. Galaxy Note10 Lite is a just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner device than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a brighter screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a better pixel density, a little larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Moto G9 Play has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G9 Play also has a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.