Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is a bit better than Moto G9 Plus, with a global score of 86.2 against 80.5. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10. Although the Galaxy Note10 Lite and the Moto G9 Plus were released with only 8 months difference, the Galaxy Note10 Lite is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a bit better performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a quite better pixels density.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G9 Plus features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.