Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Even though the Galaxy Note10 Lite is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with greater battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.