Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is noticeably newer, but much heavier and extremely thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with slightly more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.