Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 77.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it's incredibly heavier and extremely thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video definition, a 12 megapixels resolution camera and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with slightly more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.