Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Moto Z3, getting a global score of 86.2 against 77.6. Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is newer, but notably thicker and much heavier than Moto Z3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Moto Z3 have similar screens, because although the Moto Z3 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Note10 Lite captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.