Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting an 86.2 score against 76.3. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, but it's noticeably heavier and way thicker. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger screen.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has higher video frame rates.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.