Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's design is thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola One 5G Ace, despite of the fact that it was released about 12 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a display with the same size. Motorola One 5G Ace captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.