Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 86.2 score against 79.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than Motorola One Hyper, even though both of them were released only 2 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola One Hyper's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.