Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, getting a general score of 87 against 86.2. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a bit thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, although both of them were released only 8 months apart. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% larger battery size.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.