Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having a overall score of 86.2 against 79.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than OPPO Find X2, it must be told that it's also just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, so it offers a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
OPPO Find X2 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 7% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.