Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. Galaxy Note10 Lite is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both of them were only released 4 months apart. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, offering a couple additional features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better pixel count per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.