Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a general score of 86.2 against 76. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide you very similar OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a little better number of pixels per screen inch.
OPPO Find X3 Neo takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. OPPO Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite have incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.