Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's global score of 77.4. The Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it is just a bit thicker and was released many years before. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity in each inch of display. Galaxy A15 5G has as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy Note10 Lite, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.