Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a bit thicker and was released many years before.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A35 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.