Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than Galaxy Note10 Lite's general score of 86.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and Galaxy Note10 Lite were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly thinner but a lot heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11, giving a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same video definition, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video frame rate. The Galaxy Fold features more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.