Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note10 Lite's general score of 86.2. Despite being the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy M51's design is a bit thicker and a little heavier than Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.