Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy Note10 Lite's 86.2 global score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11, so it gives some nice extra features and increased performance. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer than Galaxy Note10 Lite's, although it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a little larger display.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a way better video definition and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.