Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.