Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Galaxy Note10 Lite and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Note10 Lite is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back camera and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy Note10 Lite both have very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.