Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, getting an 88.5 score against 86.2. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, although both were only released with a few months difference. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11, counting with some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little better pixels number in each inch of display. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.