Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, having a global score of 94.6 against 86.2. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is way heavier but extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy Note10 Lite one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's battery performance.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.