Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy Note10 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger aperture. Galaxy Note10 features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.