Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having a global score of 89 against 80.7. Galaxy Note10's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is just a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Note10 has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lower resolution back camera, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a battery performance that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note10 one, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has just 3430mAh of battery size against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.