Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Google Pixel 3a, with a score of 89 against 78.8. Although Galaxy Note10 and Google Pixel 3a were released only 4 months apart, the Galaxy Note10 design is just a bit thinner but also somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note10 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Galaxy Note10 has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.