Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a global score of 89 against 78.9. Galaxy Note10's body has the same weight than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's a little thinner. Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy Note10 captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower video definition and a lesser MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.