Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Galaxy Note10's construction is just a little thinner than Google Pixel 4a, although it is heavier and was released only 12 months before. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit greater screen density.
Galaxy Note10 features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.