Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's 87.5 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Galaxy Note10 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Note10 and Google Pixel 4a 5G feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size sensor and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a back camera with a higher resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.