Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 5's 89 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 5, but it is a little bit heavier. Galaxy Note10 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 5 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Google Pixel 5's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy Note10, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same camera sensor size, it also counts with a better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note10 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 5. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 5, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.