Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. The Galaxy Note10 is a newer and thinner device than HTC One M9, although it is also just a little bit heavier. HTC One M9 features a sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy Note10 features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The HTC One M9 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has greater battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 23% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Note10 captures slightly better photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a much less MP back facing camera and a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One M9, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.