Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-04-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ's overall score of 84.3. The Galaxy Note10 body weights the same than LG G8 ThinQ, but it's just a little thinner. The Galaxy Note10 and the LG G8 ThinQ feature extremely similar processing units, and although the LG G8 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater pixel density. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality pictures.
LG G8 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a battery life that's just as good as Galaxy Note10's battery performance.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G8 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG G8 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.