Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-07-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than LG G8S ThinQ, with an 89 score against 82.5. Galaxy Note10's construction has the same thickness than the LG G8S ThinQ, but it is a little bit lighter. LG G8S ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8S ThinQ's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note10's processor, and although the LG G8S ThinQ has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG G8S ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 3550mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures slightly better videos and photos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same resolution back camera and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.