Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 overall score. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the LG G8X ThinQ were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. LG G8X ThinQ's processor is very similar to the processor in Galaxy Note10, and although the LG G8X ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a little higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same sensor size and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.